|
纺织日报
2005年03月15日 |
|
2005年03月 |
| 日 |
一 |
二 |
三 |
四 |
五 |
六 |
|
|
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
| 06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005年04月 |
| 日 |
一 |
二 |
三 |
四 |
五 |
六 |
|
|
|
|
|
01 |
02 |
| 03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1、巴基斯坦求购纺织机械 |
| 2、印度求购纱线 |
| 3、印度求购坯布 |
| 4、约旦求购坯布 |
| 5、孟加拉求购剑杆织机 |
| 6、俄罗斯求购T恤 |
| 7、Indian
textile exporters eyeing brands in US, EU |
| 8、US,
EU should learn from WTO body's rulings on cotton, sugar |
|
|
| Buy:
Textile machinery |
Looking for textile machinery and agriculture machinery as
well. in textile screen printing machines,stiching machines,
cutting and embroidery machines
Company Details
|
| Buy:
Yarn |
Looking for 100% cotton, 100% polyester and cotton-polyester
blended.
Company Details
|
| Buy:
100%cotton fabrics (grey ) |
Kindly quote your best rates in $ for 100% cotton grey fabrics
cnf ex bombay(india) preferred from china 30/30 68*68
63"to 114"
Company Details
|
| Buy:
T/R Grey Fabric |
We are a leading company interest to buy T/R Grey Fabric 45X45, 96X72, Width
47" 65% Polyester, 35% Rayon. With quantity = 72000Yard So
please can you give me best C&F AQAPA port price with commission 4% .
Company Details
|
| Buy:
Rapier Looms |
We're interested to import on behalf of our customer 30
(Thirty) sets of brand new Rapier Looms.
Rapier Looms to be suitable for weaving cotton, twill,
sheeting etc.
Reed space to be 190cm, 4 or 6 colors, complete with all
standard accessories.
Company Details
|
| Buy:
T-shirt |
We have a project to supply t-shirt with 3 color imprinting to
our client. White color, material is cotton,
quantity 50000 - 100000 pcs.
I hope that this inquiry makes you interested and you provide
us with information about:
-best price for such quantity,
-availability in stock,
-delivery terms,
-packing list in m3 and Kgs,
-payment method.
If you have any query, please feel free to contact me.
Company Details
|
| Indian
textile exporters eyeing brands in US, EU |
INDIAN textile exporters are planning to move up the value
chain and are trying to grab a piece of the high-margin
branded segment in the home textile and apparel business in
the US and the European Union (EU).
A start has been made with domestic terry towel major Welspun
Industries Ltd entering into a licence agreement with global
apparel major Nautica Enterprises for manufacturing, marketing
and distributing the 'Nautica' brand of bath towels in the US
and Canadian markets.
The trend is expected to catch up even faster with many of the
blockbuster apparel and home textile brands belonging to a
number of bankrupt US textile retailers such as Pillowtex,
West Point Stevens and Dan River up for sale, industry players
said. Indian exporters are, however, expected to face stiff
competition from Chinese players, who are eyeing these brands
in a big way. In fact, the Hong Kong-based trading major, Li
& Fung, has already picked up two of the most well-known
home textiles brands in the US - Cannon and Royal Velvet from
Pillowtex. "There is definitely a big opportunity in the
branded segment in these markets," says Mr Rajinder
Gupta, Managing Director of Ludhiana-based Abhishek
Industries, among the biggest terry towel exporters in the
country.
While Pillowtex has already gone bankrupt, West Point Stevens
and Dan River are on the verge of closure. "This means
that 70,000 to 80,000 tonnes of the US towel market is up for
grabs and presents a big opportunity for Indian exporters to
expand their business opportunity," an industry player
said. Moreover, the net realisation per item for an exporter
is several times higher in case of branded products. "It
makes sense for Indian exporters to try and get a piece of the
branded segment or to float their own brands in the US, EU
markets," he said.
Following the phase-out of the quota regime in global textile
trade from January this year, Indian exporters have emerged as
major suppliers of textile items to buyers in the US and EU.
They have, however, not been able to break into the
high-margin branded segment and the foreign buyers and
retailers have largely undertaken the branding of Indian
exports so far.
The Government has, on its part, been trying to promote the
branding of exports and the Ministry of Textiles is expected
to come out with a policy for increasing India's market share
through brand building. The Chinese administration is also
encouraging textile enterprises to concentrate more on the
high-end segment and the Chinese textiles industry is also
increasingly looking at branding, fashion and design as the
prime focus areas, the industry players said.
|
| US,
EU should learn from WTO body's rulings on cotton, sugar |
|
Should not the developed countries realise and learn from the
recent rulings of the WTO body relating to subsidy on cotton
in US and support to sugar in European Union? Incidentally,
the ruling on cotton subsidy came at a time when the
negotiations on agriculture were in progress for preparation
of an "approximation" draft by July, in preparation
for the upcoming Hong Kong ministerial in December. The
preliminary ruling on support to sugar in EU came earlier and
the European Union decided to go for an appeal. European
farmers are supported by artificially high domestic prices of
sugar, high tariff barriers and several other supports. A
study conducted by Oxfam shows that six European processing
companies received more than $1 billion subsidies in 2003.
This results in surplus sugar production, which are dumped in
world markets through various supports and subsidies. The EU
sugar is dumped in the world market at low prices, leading to
a depression in global prices to the disadvantage of producers
in the Third World. As a sop to the developing and least
developing countries, the European Union allows imports
through fixed quotas as against preferential tariff - a mere
show of charity' for the crime! The US too is no less a
culprit in depressing cotton prices and denying the cotton
growers of developing countries, particularly in Africa
getting fair remunerative prices in the global market. The
Minnesota-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP)
has documented export dumping from US-based multinational
companies in the last 14 years. The US is one of the world's
largest sources of dumped agricultural commodities. The IATP
study shows a continued trend of widespread dumping by
US-based multinational companies. In 2003, wheat was exported
at an average price of 28% below the cost of production,
soybeans and corn were exported at an average price of 10%
below the cost of production, cotton was exported at an
average price of 47% below the cost of production and rice was
exported at an average price of 26% below the cost of
production. The study, however, noted a broad decrease in the
levels of dumping from the previous year for all these five
commodities. This decrease is widely recognised to be the
result of reduced supply, a result of bad weather, pest
infestation and bumped up prices. The decrease was not the
result of any changes in global trade rules or domestic
policies. Hence in 2003, the levels of dumping were very
consistent with the trend since the inception of WTO in 1995.
The study further notes: "ominously, US commodity prices
for several crops, particularly corn, have plunged in 2004,
suggesting dumping levels will increase again." The study
said that the influence of the 1996 Farm Bill on dumping was
significant. Each of the five major export commodities saw a
significant jump in export dumping when compared to seven
years before. Wheat dumping levels increased from an average
of 27% per year pre-1996 Farm Bill to 37% per year post-1996
Farm Bill. Soybean dumping level increased from 2% to 11.8%.
Corn dumping level increased from 6.8% to 19.2%. Cotton
dumping level increased from 29.4% to 48.4% and rice dumping
level increased from 13.5% to 19.2%. It is clear that the
Third World farmers can get justice in global trade, if such
glaring distortions are removed. Again at the Mombasa
mini-ministerial, the same irritant was repeated. In return
for making "farm concessions", the developed
countries wanted opening up of the service sector in the
developing world. There was no progress in freeing the
movement of natural persons under mode 4 of GATS, which is in
the interests of the developing world. The draft for services
is slated to be finalised in May, while that on agriculture is
slated to be finalised in July. Priority should be given to
finalising the agriculture draft. There is no need to
unnecessarily link the two. Services account for at least 60%
of economic activity worldwide, but less than a third of world
trade. The developed world has chosen the way of bargaining
one deal with the other instead of rendering justice to
agriculture. They are also bargaining reduction in tariffs on
industrial goods as part of the "compensation" for
"concessions" they may have to make in agriculture.
The EU offered to phase out export subsidies on farm goods on
condition that other developed countries make similar
commitments. Shamelessly too, IMF director-general Rodrigo
Rato says that developing countries can substantially benefit
if they cut their own trade barriers and farm subsidies. Mr
Rato should advise the developed countries first to reduce
their high tariff walls, give market access to the goods from
the Third World and phase out all trade distorting subsidies
and support. The US and the European Union should also learn
from the WTO body's ruling on cotton and sugar.
|
|
|
|
|